هذا ما يجعل النسبية تنهار النسبية

Scientists break speed of light
June 4, 2000 NEC Research Institute in Princeton
 Jonathan Leake, Science Editor, Times Newspapers Ltd

SCIENTISTS claim they have broken the ultimate speed barrier:
the speed of light. In research carried out in the United States,
particle physicists have shown that light pulses can be accelerated
to up to 300 times their normal velocity of 186,000 miles per second.
The implications, like the speed, are mind-boggling. On one
interpretation it means that light will arrive at its destination almost
before it has started its journey. In effect, it is leaping forward in
time.
Exact details of the findings remain confidential because they
have been submitted to Nature, the international scientific journal,
for review prior to possible publication.
The work was carried out by Dr Lijun Wang, of the NEC research
institute in Princeton, who transmitted a pulse of light towards a
chamber filled with specially treated caesium gas.
Before the pulse had fully entered the chamber it had gone right
through it and travelled a further 60ft across the laboratory. In
effect it existed in two places at once, a phenomenon that Wang
explains by saying it travelled 300 times faster than light.
The research is already causing controversy among physicists.
What bothers them is that if light could travel forward in time it could
carry information. This would breach one of the basic principles in
physics - causality, which says that a cause must come before an
effect. It would also shatter Einstein's theory of relativity since it
depends in part on the speed of light being unbreachable.
This weekend Wang said he could not give details but confirmed:
"Our light pulses did indeed travel faster than the accepted speed
of light. I hope it will give us a much better understanding of the
nature of light and how it behaves."
Dr Raymond Chiao, professor of physics at the University of
California at Berkeley, who is familiar with Wang's work, said he
was impressedby the findings. "This is a fascinating experiment,"
he said.
In Italy, another group of physicists has also succeeded in
breaking the light speed barrier. In a newly published paper,
physicists at the Italian National Research Council described how
they propagated microwaves at 25% above normal light speed.
The group speculates that it could be possible to transmit
information faster than light.
Dr Guenter Nimtz, of Cologne University, an expert in the field,
agrees. He believes that information can be sent faster than light
and last week gave a paper describing how it could be done to a
conference in Edinburgh. He believes, however, that this will not
breach the principle of causality because the time taken to interpret
the signal would fritter away all the savings.
"The most likely application for this is not in time travel but in
speeding up the way signals move through computer circuits,"
he said.
Wang's experiment is the latest and possibly the most important
evidence that the physical world may not operate according to any
of the accepted conventions.
In the new world that modern science is beginning to perceive,
sub-atomic particles can apparently exist in two places at the
same time - making no distinction between space and time.
Separate experiments carried out by Chiao illustrate this. He
showed that in certain circumstances photons - the particles of
which light is made - could apparently jump between two points
separated by a barrier in what appears to be zero time. The
process, known as tunnelling, has been used to make some of
the most sensitive electron microscopes.
The implications of Wang's experiments will arouse fierce
debate. Many will question whether his work can be interpreted
as proving that light can exceed its normal speed - suggesting
that another mechanism may be at work.
Neil Turok, professor of mathematical physics at Cambridge
University, said he awaited the details with interest, but added:
"I doubt this will change our view of the fundamental laws of
physics."
Wang emphasises that his experiments are relevant only to
light and may not apply to other physical entities. But scientists
are beginning to accept that man may eventually exploit some of
these characteristics for inter-stellar space travel.‏

FORBIDDEN LOGIC IN EINSTEINIANA

The essential difference between the twin at rest and the travelling
twin is that the latter experiences accelaration during the journey.
So in his infamous 1918 paper Einstein had no choice but to claim that
the greater youthfulness of the travelling twin is due to
acceleration. However:
http://homepage.ntlworld.com/academ/whatswrongwithrelativity.html

G. BURNISTON BROWN: "There is, in principle, no need for acceleration.
Twin A can get his velocity V before synchronizing his clock with that
of twin B as he passes. He need not turn round: he could be passed by
C who has a velocity V in the opposite direction, and who adjusts his
clock to that of A as he passes. When C later passes B they can
compare clock readings. As far as the theoretical experiment is
concerned, C's clock can be considered to be A's clock returning
without acceleration since, by hypothesis, all the clocks have the
same rate when at rest together and change with motion in the same way
independently of direction. [fn. I am indebted to Lord Halsbury for
pointing this out to me.]"
That is, even without acceleration, the travelling twin ages slower
than the twin at rest. However, without acceleration, Einstein's 1905
light postulate entails RECIPROCAL time dilation and the twin at rest
must age slower than the travelling twin.
Clearly we have REDUCTIO AD ABSURDUM showing that Einstein's 1905
light postulate is false.
Pentcho Valev wrote:
PREMISE: By increasing the perimeter of a rotating disc while keeping
the linear speed of the periphery constant, one converts clocks fixed
on the periphery into VIRTUALLY INERTIAL clocks (the "gravitational
field" they experience is reduced to zero).
CONCLUSION: In accordance with Einstein's 1905 light postulate, a
clock at rest situated outside the disc, close to the periphery, will
be seen running SLOWER than the virtually inertial clocks passing it.
Another prediction based on Einstein's 1905 light postulate is that
the clock at rest will be seen running FASTER than the virtually
inertial clocks passing it
( http://www2.bartleby.com/173/23.html ).

Clearly we have REDUCTIO AD ABSURDUM showing that Einstein's 1905
light postulate is false.
There is a consequence of Einstein's 1905 light postulate which, if
suitably applied, converts the famous clock (twin) paradox into an
obvious absurdity. Here is the consequence:
If a single inertial clock covers the distance between two other
inertial clocks (immobile relative to one another), then the single
clock runs slower than the two other clocks.
In the clock paradox scenario the travelling clock commutes between
the clock at rest and the final destination where another clock at
rest can be placed. So, according to Einstein's 1905 light postulate,
the travelling clock runs slower than the clock at rest.
However, in essentially the same scenario, the clock at rest commutes
between two travelling clocks - e.g. placed at the front end and the
back end of a very long rocket. Therefore, according to Einstein's
1905 light postulate, the clock at rest runs slower than the
travelling clock.
Clearly we have REDUCTIO AD ABSURDUM showing that Einstein's 1905
light postulate is false.‏

Boneheads has never heard of Einstein's eccentricity

A light source on top of a tower of height h emits light with
frequency f and speed c (relative to the source). The light reaches an
observer on the ground with frequency f' and speed c' (relative to the
observer).
Equivalently, a light source at the front end of an accelerating
rocket of length h and accelaration g emits light with frequency f and
speed c (relative to the source). The light reaches an observer at the
back end with frequency f' and speed c' (relative to the observer).
Consider equation (13.2) on p. 3 in:
http://student.fizika.org/~jsisko/Knjige/Klasicna%20Mehanika/David%20...

f' = f(1+v/c) = f(1+gh/c^2)    (13.2)
where v is the relative speed of the light source (at the moment of
emission) and the observer (at the moment of reception) in the rocket
scenario. By combining this equation with:
(frequency) = (speed of light)/(wavelength)
we obtain THE FUNDAMENTAL EQUATIONS OF NEWTON'S EMISSION THEORY OF
LIGHT:
c' = c+v = c(1+gh/c^2)
which CONTRADICT EINSTEIN'S 1905 FALSE LIGHT POSTULATE.
Einstein explicitly used the equation c'=c(1+gh/c^2) in the period
1907-1915, then replaced it with c'=c(1+2gh/c^2).
David Morin's text referred to above reappears as Chapter 14 in:
http://www.people.fas.harvard.edu/~djmorin/book.html

Introduction to Classical Mechanics
With Problems and Solutions
David Morin
Cambridge University Press
Pentcho Valev



Of course Bonehead has never heard of Einstein's eccentricity.‏

النظرية النسبية العامّة هي نظرية نشرها ألبرت أينشتاين في عام 1915. و هي تمثل الوصف الحالي للجاذبية في الفيزياء الحديثة. كما أنها تعميم للنظرية النسبية الخاصة حيث توحد بين النسبية الخاصة و قانون نيوتن للجاذبية، و تصف الجاذبية كخاصة لهندسة المكان و الزمان، أو ما يعرف بالزمكان.

وأضافت النظرية النسبية العامة فكرة تقعر الفراغ بوجود المادة ، وهو الأمر الذي يعني أن الخطوط المستقيمة تتشوه بوجود الكتلة ، وأثبتت النظرية النسبية العامة عندما تحقق تنبؤ أينشتاين بالتباعد الظاهري لنجمين في فترة كسوف الشمس وذلك يعود إلى تشوه مسار الضوء القادم من النجمين بسبب مرورهما قرب الشمس ذات الكتلة العالية نسبيا وبالتالي تقوس خط سير الضوء القادم من النجمين

ظهرت النسبية الخاصة عام 1905 م على يد البرت اينشتاين كبديل عن نظرية نيوتن في الزمان والمكان لتحل بشكل خاص مشاكل النظرية القديمة فيما يتعلق بالأمواج الكهرطيسية عامة, والضوء خاصة. وهي تدعى خاصة لأنها تعالج حالة افتراضية خاصة تهمل فيها تأثيرات الثقل التي ستتناولها فيما بعد النظرية العامة، العمل الذي قام به أيضا أينشتين عام 1916

حسناً....
النظرية النسبية هي نظرية قوية جداً ومحبوكة بشكل رائع, فهي (حسب ادعاء العلماء) لم يستطع أحد إثبات خطئها حتى الآن,
ولكني سمعت أن أحداً عندنا من فلسطين قام بإثبات خطئها, وهناك أيضاً الباحث سامي عمر محمود شلايل والذي ألف بذلك كتاباً حول "خطأ النسبية وبديلها الشامل", لم أفهم الكتاب الذي طلبته أهو عن النسبية ام عن خطئها, إن كان عن النسبية , فابحث على جوجل ستجد الكثير من الشروح المبسطة عنها, أما إذا أردت عن خطئها فإليك كتاب "خطأ النظرية النسبية الخاصة والعامة لأينشتين وبديلهما الشامل" الكتاب متوفر على الإنترنت, لا أدري عن المكتبات

هذه مجموعة حوارية جديدة العلماء العرب يمكنكم الاشتراك فيها

http://groups.google.com/group/science-first‏

بعض أخطاء النظرية النسبية

1- أصبح من المعروف أن المبدأ التي بنيت عليه النظرية هو مبدأ غبي.
أي ثبات سرعة الضوء في كل المراجع وبغض النظر عن سرعة الرصد.
2- منذ أكثر من سنة والعلماء في الغرب يستهزئون بالنظرية,

أما نحن العرب فنعتقد أن كل من يعرف كلمتين من خزعبلات النظرية النسبية.
هو عبقري

3- هذه المعادلة    E = mc^2    , لالينتو دي بريتو الايطالي وليست لاينشتاين.


E=mc2 existed before Einstein.  
An Italian Olinto de Pretto published E=m*c^2 in a valid scientific
journal "Lettere ed Atti", Feb. 1904, two years before Einstein.


فهم اينشتاين تجربة مايكلسون ومولي بشكل غبي, رغم انه ادعى عدم سماعه فيها

4- الفوتون ليس له كتلة صفرية, بل له كتلة وشحنة مثل أي جسم آخر.

5- معادلة المسمى بمعادلة اينشتاين من الخطأ الاعتماد على مصداقيتها المطلقة ودعمها رياضيا لانها تقريبية.
6- إذن لا يجب أن تدعم بتحويلات لورنتز.
7- لم تعطي أية نتيجة صحيحة حتى الآن.
8- حتى الآن لا توجد أية تجربة تؤكد صحتها بتاتا بتاتا بتاتا.
9- في المعادلة غير دقيقة حساب الطاقة الناتجة عن القنبلة النووية.
10- فهم اينشتاين تجربة مايكلسون ومولي بشكل غبي, رغم انه ادعى عدم سماعه فيها


وهذا أهم ما في الأمر

الأخmastar شرح أبعاد النظرية بالفعل، ولكني أجيب عن نقطة أخرى:
أي نظرية في الفيزياء بالذات، تتطور أولا بأول.. ولا يوجد شئ اسمه نقض لنظرية أثبتت صحتها بالفعل في العديد من التطبيقات.. هناك فقط ما يسمى بتعديل لها. أما أن يأتي شخص اليوم وينقض نظرية كاملة، قامت عليها علوم جديدة.. فلا رد عليه

قد تفيدك هذه المواضيع:
http://success-a.blogspot.com/2011/05/blog-post_28.html
http://success-a.blogspot.com/2011/05/blog-post_31.html
http://success-a.blogspot.com/2011/06/blog-post.html‏